<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Look at Stevia</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lowdensitylifestyle.com/a-look-at-stevia/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lowdensitylifestyle.com/a-look-at-stevia/</link>
	<description>The Secret to Becoming FREE</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 10:36:18 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Todd</title>
		<link>http://www.lowdensitylifestyle.com/a-look-at-stevia/comment-page-1/#comment-1293</link>
		<dc:creator>Todd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 13:14:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lowdensitylifestyle.com/?p=1896#comment-1293</guid>
		<description>Its interesting, I have seen variations of this article on the web on various websites, and it sounds like talking points from an entity that clearly does not want stevia used. 

For instance: &quot;In the laboratory, steviol can be converted into a mutagenic compound, which may promote Mutating cells can lead to cancer.&quot;  So, what did they convert it into?  Look at the language...they converted steviol into something else first, THEN it MAY PROMOTE cells which CAN lead to cancer.   Wow.  Talk about a stretch. In otherwords, we can change stevia into something else that might promote mutations in cells that might lead to cancer.  Right.

I would really like to know exactly who authored this article that is showing up everywhere. Its probably either sugar interests or Corn interests (who don&#039;t want to stop pumping the US population with high fructose corn syrup and sugar).

Why aren&#039;t any of these studies cited? 

I am totally open to real science that says stevia is somehow harmful.  I don&#039;t use it, nor do I use any artificial sweeteners.  But this article is obviously some industry press release that is getting re-printed all over the internet and is trying to scare people with really bad &quot;science.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Its interesting, I have seen variations of this article on the web on various websites, and it sounds like talking points from an entity that clearly does not want stevia used. </p>
<p>For instance: &#8220;In the laboratory, steviol can be converted into a mutagenic compound, which may promote Mutating cells can lead to cancer.&#8221;  So, what did they convert it into?  Look at the language&#8230;they converted steviol into something else first, THEN it MAY PROMOTE cells which CAN lead to cancer.   Wow.  Talk about a stretch. In otherwords, we can change stevia into something else that might promote mutations in cells that might lead to cancer.  Right.</p>
<p>I would really like to know exactly who authored this article that is showing up everywhere. Its probably either sugar interests or Corn interests (who don&#8217;t want to stop pumping the US population with high fructose corn syrup and sugar).</p>
<p>Why aren&#8217;t any of these studies cited? </p>
<p>I am totally open to real science that says stevia is somehow harmful.  I don&#8217;t use it, nor do I use any artificial sweeteners.  But this article is obviously some industry press release that is getting re-printed all over the internet and is trying to scare people with really bad &#8220;science.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A Look at Agave Syrup : The Low Density Lifestyle</title>
		<link>http://www.lowdensitylifestyle.com/a-look-at-stevia/comment-page-1/#comment-953</link>
		<dc:creator>A Look at Agave Syrup : The Low Density Lifestyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 02:22:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lowdensitylifestyle.com/?p=1896#comment-953</guid>
		<description>[...] week I discussed stevia, the natural alternative to sugar. I gave the pros and cons of it, and said there were some issues [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] week I discussed stevia, the natural alternative to sugar. I gave the pros and cons of it, and said there were some issues [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

